Did you watch football this weekend?
I assume not. I assume you were single-mindedly focused on studying. (Please do not do anything to disillusion me.)
Allow me to summarize.
It was a hot mess. (I refer specifically to the Oakland/Pittsburg event. Calling it a “game” seems to stretch the imagination.)
Which got me thinking about the days of the one-platoon system when players played both offense and defense.
When the two-platoon format (that we use today) was first introduced, Tennessee head coach “General” Robert Neyland called it “chickenshit football“. I think he may have had a point.
There are a lots of arguments both for and against the current two-platoon system. You can see a bunch of them here. Most of them are more objective than “chickenshit football”.
But really, I can’t think of another sport where players specialize in either off- or def- and don’t bother learning the other side of the game.
So I think we should go back to the origins of the game. When men were men* and mud was mud and the only people who specialized were QBs and kickers. As it should be.
*Just so we’re clear, that wasn’t a sexist remark. There just weren’t any women in the game [or the mud] then.
Although I’m not clear about the gender of the mud.